[dropping [email protected], I highly doubt this is a Linux bug.]

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 15:12 UTC, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> I did some digging and it looks like the system clock on this motherboard
> with the latest BIOS (2.00a) runs 1 second too fast when comparing to other
> NTP-synchronized machines.

I doubt that's relevant, but please refer to your source for that
info.  The thing is, the mobo clock is only consulted once at boot
time to initialize the OS clock.  How it drifts while the system is
off or on has no effect in how the system clock drifts.

> When comparing the clock on this vs. an atomic clock, the system clock is ~1
> second faster, which is probably why the GPS has problems syncing.
>
> $ ntpq -pn
>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
> jitter
> ============================================================================
> ==
> x127.127.28.0    .GPS.            0 l   11   16  377    0.000    0.363
> 100.414
> *204.235.61.9    128.174.38.133   2 u   48   64   37   48.716  -985.27
> 326.767
> +184.105.192.247 216.218.254.202  2 u   43   64   37   90.902  -987.55
> 332.766
> +50.7.247.114    85.114.26.194    2 u   42   64   37  158.445  -985.19
> 330.627
> +69.65.40.29     209.51.161.238   2 u   43   64   37   47.733  -984.50
> 329.232
>
> Any idea why it consistently has a ~1 second offset?
> Is there a good way to fix this?

My guess would be the NMEA output is starting relatively late the UTC
second and continuing into the next second.  Using NMEA from a GPS
without also using the PPS signal is difficult at best -- you're
depending on the NMEA emission being consistently offset from UTC,
which it is not with many receivers.  With some, NMEA timing wander
hundreds of milliseconds relative to UTC.  If you're lucky and that
unit has stable NMEA timing, you should be able to fudge it into
submission.  Try:

fudge 127.127.28.0 time1 -0.985

Cheers,
Dave Hart
_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to