I did think about extending the RS-232 cable, but with it would also have
to go
a USB cable extension to power the board. Although now that you mention it,
and I sit here and ponder that idea, maybe that is the better solution.
Although
instead of running a RS-232 cable plus USB cable "as-is", just get a 50ft
RS-232
cable, splice it, and utilize 2 wires for the USB power. I suppose that
prompts the
question, which RS-232 pins are unused?

 Correct me if I'm mistaken, but are pins 4 & 6 thru 9 unused?






On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Hal Murray <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> [email protected] said:
> >  I have a Sure Electronics GPS board and I want to extend the antenna
> cable
> > several feet. Is anybody able to confirm the RG cable type and coax
> > connector of the antenna? My assumption is it's a RG-58 cable with a SMA
> > connector.
>
> It's probably easier to extend the RS-232 cable.  :)
>
> ----------
>
> There are 2 issues with coax.
>
> One is loss due to skin effect and dielectric absorbtion, measured in
> dB/meter.  It's frequency dependent.  GPS L1 is 1.4 GHz.  Most coax is
> generally not great at that frequency.
>
> The other is loss due to impedance mismatch.  Most lab setups use 50 ohm
> coax.  Cable TV uses 75 ohms.
>
> In general, bigger coax is lower loss, and for the same outside diameter,
> 75
> ohm coax is lower loss than 50 ohms.
>
> Most decent coax uses foam-polyethylene for the dielectric.  The air in the
> coax is close to zero dielectric loss.
>
> Most GPS antennas and receivers are setup for 50 ohms.  Trimble points out
> that the loss due to impedance mismatch is low compared to not-many feet of
> readily available coax, so RG-6 works better than you might expect.  They
> ship RG-6 in their evaluation kit.
>
> -----------
>
> The thin cable on the Sure antenna is probably RG-174.
>
> RG-174 is 50 ohms.  It's 1/10 inch dia, high loss.
>   (but flexible and inexpensive)
> RG-58 is 50 ohms.  It's about 1/4 inch in diameter.
>   This is standard lab coax.
> RG-59 is 75 ohms with roughly the same diameter as RG-58.
> RG-6 is 75 ohms.  It's slightly bigger and significantly lower loss.
>   It's widely available as low-loss cable TV coax.
> LMR-400 is about 1/2 inch in diameter.  It's 50 ohms, low loss, and
> expensive.
>
> Lots of good info here:
>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coaxial_cable
>
>
>
> --
> These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pool mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
>
_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to