The PDF standard says that there are a set of tables that are REQUIRED in the PDF - OS/2 isn't one of them.
Otherwise, everything else you saw is correct. Leonard -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of suzuki toshiya Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 4:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [poppler] pdftohtml : enhancing it to use embedded fonts I guess, what Leonard said would be: Type42 font format does not require to preserve "OS/2" table, so PDF or Type42 embedded font cannot convey the permission info. Although PDF is new technology and I wish if it can hold such info, the lack of such info in Type42 is reasonable, because it might have been designed when most TrueType didn't have OS/2 table. I will check if there is more appropriate way to convey the info. Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Leonard Rosenthol va escriure: >> If the flags are there, you can use them - the problem is that many >> PDF creators remove them :(. > > If the flags are not there, it means we are allowed to use the font, right? > The specification says so. > > I wonder why all that font copyright holders are not sueing those many > PDF creators that strip the protection from their files. > > Albert > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
