06.02.2023 10:03, Theo Buehler пишет: > I always thought of xpdf as a relatively lightweight pdf viewer. This > diff makes it depend on Qt stuff which is all but lightweight. > > What are alternatives on older architectures?
mupdf should be there, which is pretty small and decent. > Should xpdf 3 be kept around? Compared to mupdf, though, xpdf 3 has this nice chapter view and is great for navigating specifications and such. No idea about the printing bits. I wouldn't mind keeping a copy of old xpdf if it benefits users and doesn't turn into an unmaintained port which will eventually lack critical fixes or so.
