On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:35:17AM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > FYI: only the gtk flavor of ghostscript contains libgs, so a
> > GraphicsMagick flavor depending on libgs (i.e. --with-gslib) would
> > have to explicitely depend on ghostscript's gtk flavor.
> >
> > So, please just keep the CONFIGURE_ARGS += --without-gslib in
> > GraphicsMagick.
> >
> Then the port now is broken, because no matter what, GraphicsMagick
> picks up ghostscript. So keeping "CONFIGURE_ARGS += --without-gslib"
> only matters if we also remove the
> BUILD_DEPENDS+= :ghostscript-*:print/ghostscript/gnu[,no_x11]
> RUN_DEPENDS+= :ghostscript-*:print/ghostscript/gnu[,no_x11]
> lines.
No, --without-gslib just ensures that GraphicsMagick isn't linked
against libgs, even if libgs is available. It does *not* stop
GraphicsMagick from using the ghostscript binary at runtime (for
whatever purpose; I didn't yet have the time to look at GraphicsMagick).
Ciao,
Kil
