On Sunday 30 November 2008 11.08.25 Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:35:17AM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > > > FYI: only the gtk flavor of ghostscript contains libgs, so a > > > GraphicsMagick flavor depending on libgs (i.e. --with-gslib) > > > would have to explicitely depend on ghostscript's gtk flavor. > > > > > > So, please just keep the CONFIGURE_ARGS += --without-gslib in > > > GraphicsMagick. > > > > Then the port now is broken, because no matter what, GraphicsMagick > > picks up ghostscript. So keeping "CONFIGURE_ARGS += > > --without-gslib" only matters if we also remove the > > BUILD_DEPENDS+= > > :ghostscript-*:print/ghostscript/gnu[,no_x11] RUN_DEPENDS+= > > :ghostscript-*:print/ghostscript/gnu[,no_x11] lines. > > No, --without-gslib just ensures that GraphicsMagick isn't linked > against libgs, even if libgs is available. It does *not* stop > GraphicsMagick from using the ghostscript binary at runtime (for > whatever purpose; I didn't yet have the time to look at > GraphicsMagick). > Aha! I can see clearly now :) In the spirit of that, it's a new patch:
http://leva.ecentrum.hu/patches/GraphicsMagick_1.2.6+no_gs.diff Daniel -- LEVAI Daniel PGP key ID = 0x4AC0A4B1 Key fingerprint = D037 03B9 C12D D338 4412 2D83 1373 917A 4AC0 A4B1
