On Sunday 30 November 2008 12.59.51 Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:30:06AM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > > > > Then the port now is broken, because no matter what, > > > > GraphicsMagick picks up ghostscript. So keeping "CONFIGURE_ARGS > > > > += > > > > --without-gslib" only matters if we also remove the > > > > BUILD_DEPENDS+= > > > > > > > > :ghostscript-*:print/ghostscript/gnu[,no_x11] RUN_DEPENDS+= > > > > : > > > > :ghostscript-*:print/ghostscript/gnu[,no_x11] lines. > > > > > > No, --without-gslib just ensures that GraphicsMagick isn't linked > > > against libgs, even if libgs is available. It does *not* stop > > > GraphicsMagick from using the ghostscript binary at runtime (for > > > whatever purpose; I didn't yet have the time to look at > > > GraphicsMagick). > > > > Aha! I can see clearly now :) In the spirit of that, it's a new > > patch: > > > > http://leva.ecentrum.hu/patches/GraphicsMagick_1.2.6+no_gs.diff > > After a closer look at configure.ac and at the source trees after > make configure (with ghostscript installed and uninstalled), I think > you really don't need the no_gs flavor. The only relevant part that > of GraphicsMagick that will be different is delegates.mgk, and it > only differs in what ghostscript device will be used for the gs-color > delegate (pnmraw vs. ppmraw). > > So you can omit the no_gs flavor and drop the RUN_DEPENDS on > ghostscript (but not the BUILD_DEPENDS). You mean to leave the BUILD_DEPENDS only if we are not building a no_x11 FLAVOR, I presume?
Daniel -- LEVAI Daniel PGP key ID = 0x4AC0A4B1 Key fingerprint = D037 03B9 C12D D338 4412 2D83 1373 917A 4AC0 A4B1
