On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:55:35AM +1100, Brett Mahar wrote: > On 01/05/13 08:50, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > >This is already confusing enough in terms of PR & branches, so i'll > >stop here. > > > >What do thunderbird users want for the openbsd port ? rather tracking > >the 17.0.x release (and 24.0.x release after that..) ? or be a bit > >adventurous & use the -beta releases which track mozilla/firefox more > >closely ? Fwiw i use the betas daily, and they work fine. > >(no i WONT make two separate ports. get real.) > > > >I'd love to hear feedback from people who care. > > > >Landry > > > > Given that new versions of Firefox and Thunderbird often contain > security vulnerability fixes, and you say the betas work fine, I > would say use the betas.
The 17.0.x/24.0.x releases would be the same concept as the ESR releases for FF so they would have security fixes included. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
