14.01.2013 19:06 пользователь "Vadim Zhukov" <persg...@gmail.com> написал: > > 2013/1/14 David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 14.01.2013 18:43 пользователь "Gonzalo L. R." <gonz...@x61.com.ar> написал: > >>> > >>> No one interested? :) > >> > >> Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have > >> others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? > > > > Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch > > to rthreads... > > Ah, OK. I'll look into the OP port a few hours later to be able to > test on the speedy inet connection.
It took a bit more time, sorry. :( Reads fine for me (you definitely need another okay, though), works on i386 with SandyBridge. Two nits, though: 1) The port, probably, deserves "www" category, too. 2) SMPlayer streaming did not work for me, but both MPlayer and VLC did. Probably an SMPlayer, but if it is a common problem and could not get fixed, maybe use MPlayer as default in SMtube?
