On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:26:51PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:31:57PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Brad Smith <b...@comstyle.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > > >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > 14.01.2013 18:43 ???????????? "Gonzalo L. R." <gonz...@x61.com.ar> > > >> > ???????: > > >> >> > > >> >> No one interested? :) > > >> > > > >> > Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have > > >> > others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? > > >> > > >> Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch > > >> to rthreads... > > > > > > Lots of things are. > > > > I know. For example, HTML5 videos with firefox is another one. > > I can see HTML5 videos with Firefox but I'm using Gregor Best's patches > for the scheduler. I guess when my ATI is 100% supported by xenocara the > video will be more fluid, now top shows a high use of the CPU by xorg. I > mean rthreads isn't the only culprit.
It's not the only curprit but it is the biggest part of the problem. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
