On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:31:57PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Brad Smith <b...@comstyle.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > 14.01.2013 18:43 ???????????? "Gonzalo L. R." <gonz...@x61.com.ar> 
> >> > ???????:
> >> >>
> >> >> No one interested? :)
> >> >
> >> > Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have
> >> > others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt?
> >>
> >> Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch
> >> to rthreads...
> >
> > Lots of things are.
> 
> I know. For example, HTML5 videos with firefox is another one.

I can see HTML5 videos with Firefox but I'm using Gregor Best's patches
for the scheduler. I guess when my ATI is 100% supported by xenocara the
video will be more fluid, now top shows a high use of the CPU by xorg. I
mean rthreads isn't the only culprit.

-- 
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info

Reply via email to