On 2018/02/22 04:59, Jiri B wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:21:54AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > As for the update itself, i have no opinion. You decided to use 2.1 on
> > your clients, you assume the choice...
> Do you want to keep old stable? Should I create new 'branch'
> for 2.1.x or just update current port?
Since a client may be stuck with an old server that is difficult to get
updated, carrying multiple branches might be useful. And since this is
unlikely to be a build dep of other ports, there should be no requirement
to avoid a conflict between the two.