Robert A. Ober wrote: > On 3/4/2009 9:56 AM, Scent-Sations Support wrote: >> Robert A. Ober wrote: >> >>> On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> >>> No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated >>> error. It does not like the -n . >>> >>> >> Charles means 'postconf -n'. >> This gives us a better picture of what Postfix is using and avoids fat >> finger mistakes. >> >> Brian >> > > But of course! > > Here it is; > > mynetworks = 76.224.200.64/29
I would add in 127.0.0.1 to that too. > > smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, > permit_sasl_authenticated, check_client_access > hash:/etc/postfix/pop-before-smtp If there are no REJECTs in that hash, then it has no effect. > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, > permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes This means use cyrus SASL unless smtpd_sasl_type=dovecot and smtpd_sasl_path are set. > smtpd_sasl_local_domain = robob.com > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous > smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated This restriction has no meaning other than: permit,permit,permit. > > Robert;-) > PS:Turned off the sasl_auth_type = dovecot as it kept my IMAP from > sending as well. > You mentioned having issues with Dovecot. Have you read over http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_dovecot ? Brian
