On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 05:09:00PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:53:37PM -0400, Ryan Suarez wrote:
> > Does an entry in header_checks need to be defined for each
> > recipient? If so, it wouldn't be feasible due to the number of
> > addresses we have. Is there another way to accomplish this?
> Can you use a pcre/regex map instead?
Noel was talking about header_checks(5), which by definition must be
a pcre_table(5) or a regexp_table(5). But as covered by other posts
in the thread, it's a bad idea to do header-based routing.
--
Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
"/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
