* Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org>: > Noel Jones: > > As I see it, there are two complementary paths we can take > > with DNS whitelists, each with a slightly different purpose. > > While these are both useful, neither depends on the other, so > > postfix can implement either or both. > > I'll read the entire proposal later. > > Would this notation work: > > dnswl1.example.com=127.0.0.2*weight1, dnswl2.example.com=127.0.0.1*weight2 > dnsbl3.example.com=127.0.0.3*weight3, dnsbl4.example.com=127.0.0.1*weight4
weightn can be negative? > Do we want to allow mixing DNSWLs and DNSBLs in one list? Probably, with positiv and negative weights? -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
