" i know all you know nothing" then kill the thread so people can't show you might be wrong or defend themselves, oh my. how nice, now I recall why i probably left this list last time! I hope you get that new job in the censorship office, you've got the right credentials.
and for the record, I dont give a rats ass of your opinion, if some turd is trying to pollute my networks, I dont want them here, period! In use of ANY anti spam method there will ALWAYS be collateral damage, regardless of what method is used. Thats why god invented whitelists. Now I shall be silent On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:42 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse: > > [About blocking all mail from an ISP because some customer sent spam] > > Such an approach makes sense only if receiving one spam message is > > a bigger problem than losing a larger amount of legitimate email. > > Noel Butler: > > But how do you know its only " one " I'm sure if this IP in question was > > Your response shows that you have no clue about the ham:spam ratio > (I do have a clue: I've been customer for 14 years and can't remember > when I last received spam that originates from their network). > > This is a technical mailing list about Postfix. There is no room > here for contributions without quantitative technical content. > > >From now on there is a taboo on SORBS, just like SPF. Trespassers > will be shot. > > Wietse
