On Mon, May 5, 2014 15:38, Larry Stone wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2014, James B. Byrne wrote:

> And despite your claim that you told
> Mailman to send to port 587 instead (no proof provided), you must not have
> done what you thought you did. But the Mailman list is the place for what
> you need.
>

As the attempt failed there cannot be any proof other than showing that I set
this in mm_cfg.py

SMTPPORT = 587

However, I suspect that I tripped up over authentication on that port and the
mailman forwarded messages never got to Postfix in consequence.  I will take
this up on the Mailman list.  Thank you for your assistance.

I am aware that Mailman-2.1.18 has been released.  Sadly I must await the
folks at epel to package it due to corporate constraints.  So I had hoped that
there might be a work around I could find that made use of the software that I
already have.

-- 
***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
James B. Byrne                mailto:[email protected]
Harte & Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

Reply via email to