also sprach Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> [2015-11-14 05:43 +1300]: > > I am doing greylisting in smtpd_client_restrictions and later > > a policy server check in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (postconf > > included below). smtpd_delay_reject is on (the default). > > Greylisting typically generates a "defer_if_permit" verdict.
You are absolutely correct: postgrey returns DEFER_IF_PERMIT by default. I was looking in the wrong place(s) and didn't consider that the protocol between postfix and postgrey was more than just black'n'white. > > postgrey[27226]: action=greylist, reason=new, client_name=unknown, > > client_address=120.28.68.66, sender=reconnoitering...@bk.ru, > > recipient=new-...@pobox.madduck.net > > Replies with "defer_if_permit". Could you discern this from the message or did you just know that postgrey does this by default and assumed I didn't change that? -- @martinkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "everyone smiles as you drift past the flower that grows so incredibly high." -- the beatles spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
