>>>>> "Matus" == Matus UHLAR <- fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>> writes:
Matus> On 26.07.18 13:38, Luc Pardon wrote: >>>> Recently, my provider forced me from ADSL (being phased out here) to >>>> VDSL, and I now find myself sending mail from a "dynamic" IP address... >>>>>>> "Matus" == Matus UHLAR <- fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>> writes: Matus> is it really dynamic? Was the previous one dynamic? Matus> If not, ask them to assign you a DNS name that does NOT look like dynamic Matus> (and is not listed in dynamic dns blacklists). >> Matus> Wietse told you the rest. Imho there's no point in playing with what you Matus> propose inatead of fixing the IP reputation. Matus> On 26.07.18 11:14, John Stoffel wrote: >> Or do what I do and spin up a Digital Ocean droplet for $6/mo that >> lets me run postfix/dovecot and my own domain (DNS costs extra, of >> course) to handle all my email needs for my private domain. Matus> or do what I do and have own dedicated server in ISP's hosting centre Matus> running own services... *grin* That too! Matus> well, everyone has their possibilities. if an ISP forces aDSL Matus> user to vDSL, they should take care of things like blacklists Matus> and DNS records. Matus> Anyway, whole point of this discussion that working around Matus> problems by violating RFC and re-sending hardly (5xx) refused Matus> mail through an ISP is not way to go. Matus> and thus it's not problem to solve at postfix level, unless you Matus> of course configure (temporarily) your ISPs mailserver as Matus> relayhost. True... in my experience here in the US, trying to send personal domain email via ISP's mailservers is just not going to work ever. It's a pain at times, but hosting it myself is good experience.
