My test was on OS/X 10.5 on Intel, but come to think of it I have no idea if that's a 64 bit architecture or not! :) Have you run the test on 32bit Mark?
P On 3/17/08, Mark Cave-Ayland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 17 March 2008 15:04:36 Paul Ramsey wrote: > > Mike, > > > > You don't appear to be doing anything wrong, and I can recreate the > > same behavior here. I've filed it as a bug. The source of the problem > > is unclear. > > > > P > > > Hmmm that almost indicates that there is a memory/alignment issue which > suggests 1 of 2 things: > > 1) It could be triggered by a 64-bit as opposed to 32-bit architecture > 2) It could be triggered by the new PostgreSQL 8.3 varlena structures > > Does anyone have an x86_64 PostgreSQL 8.2.x installation lying around they > can > use to help narrow this down? > > > ATB, > > Mark. > > > -- > Mark Cave-Ayland > Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts > http://www.siriusit.co.uk > T: +44 870 608 0063 > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
