On 3/17/08, Mark Cave-Ayland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 17 March 2008 16:23:13 Paul Ramsey wrote: > > My test was on OS/X 10.5 on Intel, but come to think of it I have no > > idea if that's a 64 bit architecture or not! :) Have you run the test > > on 32bit Mark? > > > > P > > > Nope not yet; I'm still in the process of setting up various build > environments. Does OS X support "uname -a" to show exactly what architecture > you are running on?
Heron:~ pramsey$ uname -a Darwin Heron.local 9.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.0: Tue Feb 5 16:13:22 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.3.13~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 Nothing definitive that I can see. I'm putting together a centos virtual box now to see if the test fails there too. > Incidentally I did try compiling up a quick and easy PostGIS 1.3.2 test > installation without GEOS/PROJ.4 the other day, and the build fails when > trying to insert the PostgreSQL function wrapper for the coveredby() > function - my first is that these functions do not have any GEOS detection > code around them, but I didn't have much time to stop and play :( > > BTW are we definitely committed to using the Google bug tracker? I can't say > that it's my favourite application ever, but there are a whole list of > outstanding bugs on the wiki that could do with being added, and I won't be > able to spend much time in the way of bugfixing for another couple of weeks. Yes, that's what we're using. If I have to screen-scrape the content out some time in the future, that will be my cross to bear. P > > > ATB, > > Mark. > > -- > Mark Cave-Ayland > Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts > http://www.siriusit.co.uk > T: +44 870 608 0063 > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
