On Monday 17 March 2008 16:23:13 Paul Ramsey wrote: > My test was on OS/X 10.5 on Intel, but come to think of it I have no > idea if that's a 64 bit architecture or not! :) Have you run the test > on 32bit Mark? > > P
Nope not yet; I'm still in the process of setting up various build environments. Does OS X support "uname -a" to show exactly what architecture you are running on? Incidentally I did try compiling up a quick and easy PostGIS 1.3.2 test installation without GEOS/PROJ.4 the other day, and the build fails when trying to insert the PostgreSQL function wrapper for the coveredby() function - my first is that these functions do not have any GEOS detection code around them, but I didn't have much time to stop and play :( BTW are we definitely committed to using the Google bug tracker? I can't say that it's my favourite application ever, but there are a whole list of outstanding bugs on the wiki that could do with being added, and I won't be able to spend much time in the way of bugfixing for another couple of weeks. ATB, Mark. -- Mark Cave-Ayland Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts http://www.siriusit.co.uk T: +44 870 608 0063 _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
