> read the docs, I see no practical difference between wait.until and > wait.for. Both can be used for the very same purposes, or is there > anything I've missed out? Is there a need for wait.until?
The relevant help: · wait for [...] Multiple outstanding waits can exist, but only the last executed one is monitored; when it completes, the next to last is monitored, and so on. · wait until [...] Multiple outstanding waits can exist and each is monitored independently. If you want to see the difference in action, create one script wait.for(5000) debug wait 5000 done and another script wait.for(11000) debug wait 11000 done Create a way to start each script separately, eg from button presses. Now start the first one, then immediately start the second one. Which will end first? According to the help, the 11000 one will. wait.until would be different.
