--- In [email protected], "brucexs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I ran the script at the bottom of this note both as a file and as a > command list and it ran about 20% faster as a command list. I don't > think buffering would get back all of this 20% by any means, but even > 20% is not worth worrying about. If you have a case where you think > it is, you can always put the script in a command list.
Ok, thanks for explaining this. I also think that this is no big deal. It was a general notice because I knew of other app that was doing unbuffered reading and this made a noticeable difference. But it operated on much bigger files and as scripts are generally not that big, the difference shouldn't be nothing to worry about.
