Hi, On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:04:24PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote: > Andreas, please take your rants somewhere else. This is not a discussion > forum on > how bad X or Y is, nor is it a place to dump grief.
Sorry, I've had way too many software-related things fail on me (and rest assured: not only me!) during the last two weeks to keep any sizeable tolerance level currently. (e.g. some assorted 5 or 6 different annoying CUPS failures - leaving me almost entirely printing-capability-less until I managed to figure out one golden combo - and 4 to 5 different annoying kernel failures and regressions). > I know for a fact that the Xfce team is extremely responsive to bugreports of > substance, and have worked closely with them to improve things where possible. Well, then they might be better than icewm (coincidentally that's the icewm I mentioned before, hohumm...) which I provided a wakeup patch tracker item for which never received any response. AFAIR the initial bloat situation of icewm was a lot better than with xfce anyway, though... > If you have a problem with a certain application, please feel free to drop a > line > on this forum, but also report it to the maintainers of that application. Try > 'bugzilla.xfce.org'. I know for a fact that the Xfce4 team would seriously > look > into the issue you describe above here. There _are_ existing bug reports about these and similar things (I haven't looked at whether they're being worked at or not though). Will keep my ramblings to myself now, Andreas Mohr _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
