Justin Mattock:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Dietz Proepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Yes - a recent fglrx. The behaviour should be history for at least 10
> > months now.
>
> Well, the problem with fglrx is the whole
> proprietary thing.
If one wants to get religious about open vs. closed source - well, that's a
completely different kind of discussion. I can just state, the 60 wakeups
per s issue with fglrx is history (at least against a Radeon X1400, how
others behave I can't assess.)
> thankfully radeon
> isn't. for the past months using fglrx was
> a reliable way for suspend to work, until
> radeon grew better.
Can they do 2d and 3d acceleration on the same device now? The last time I
looked that was the obvious show stopper (for me).
How about power management and resume/suspend? Fglrx does a great job
regarding these for me.
> Now I'm running without
> fglrx, and suspend("knock on wood") works
> with s2ram, not so good with
> echo mem > /sys/power/state
> I figured it's just a matter of time until things
> get debugged and so forth.
That's true anyway ;-). And not having to fiddle though the driver sources
at every 2nd kernel update would be nice, too...
_______________________________________________
Power mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
