I know they technically don't mean much. It all comes down to writing code that is designed around the architecture of the computer.
But.. I have noticed when reading benchmarks and testing done on the 3400 and other Mac products that most reviewers tend to test the product out of the box with no optimizations. Anyone have any Idea how a hot rodded 3400 will stand up to an out-of-the-box Kanga? If the original Kanga was about 50% faster than the 3400 it makes me wonder if the 3400 with the full 144MB ram, faster HD, along with other OS optimizations, like a Ram Drive, if it would not be more powerfull than the Kanga or another out-of-the-box G3? Just wondering. I love tweaking things. -- PowerBooks is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> PowerBooks list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/powerbooks.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/powerbooks%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
