This is potentially pretty naive from a business perspective. Any producer that does not listen to customer feedback is not going to be in business for the long haul. Given the amount of these discussions on this list, I assume CTM monitors it to aggregate customer opinions. However, if they do not then all this discussion is indeed a waste of time, and hopefully they have another mechanism to accomplish this. If that is the case, then it would be nice to let everyone know.
Ron Mikael Byström wrote on 8/11/05: >H.R. Riggs said: > >>I would have to say that rather than spend the time updating the UI at >>this point, I think the handling of attachments can be improved. >I find suggestions and opinion on in what order CTM should and should not >implement specific features to be quite wasteful and pointless. I suggest >what we should do at this list regarding features is to discuss their >merits and shortcomings and leave it to CTM to decide what to implement >and when. >> >>I used to religiously file attachments in the "appropriate" folder as >>they came in. I still do that with some attachments, but I find many >>don't really have an appropriate folder and I leave them in the >>Attachments folder. This means that the # of files in the Attachments >>folder is rather large. It would be nice if PM would automatically file >>the attachments in subfolders with names corresponding to the mail >>subfolders where the message is stored. This should apply, of course, >>only to attachments in the Attachments folder, not to those that I've >>moved out of it. >So you're suggesting an improvement to setting up just this functionality >in the filter section? This could be accomplished with a filter wizard or >similar. What other ways can you people imagine to achieve attachments >being moved to useful places automagically?
