Judi Sohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:20:52 -0600 Bill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > >>I have to agree, if you get too much spam, get SpamSieve period. > >And here's another vote. Shortly after I downloaded SpamSieve 2.0 >(upgrade) I wiped out my corpus as recommended and used my already >existing Spam folder with 700 messages to retrain SS. I had a bit of a >few false positive/negatives (dropping SS's accuracy from 98% down to >about 87%) but then I adjusted the slider in the prefs and I think I >found the sweet spot. In the past 24 hours its accuracy has been near- perfect.
Ever since updating to PowerMail 4.2 and SpamSieve 2.0 the PM filters have been setting about 90% of incoming mail (both spam and good) to Label Priority No. 7, with no recognizable pattern. I noticed that the SpamSieve 'label if spam' script has No. 7 as the default, but my PM filter is definitely set to 'move if spam'. Would this be problem with PM or SpamSieve? - Jud -
