Am/On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:04:24 -0400 schrieb/wrote Winston Weinmann: >Wayne wrote: >>I doubt that a ton of effort is going to be spent on this issue >>because most of us don't really use that feature often and I, and I'm >>sure others, would rather see CTM Dev spend their time improving or >>fixing other issues rather than HTML email. > >That is a valid point. CTM should definitely work on the issues of >greatest concern to its user base. I am curious how many other PM users >find the HTML printing problems more than just a minor annoyance. > >I waste paper and ink with blank printouts, or printouts with more pages >than needed. (Yes, I re-use the pages printed with only a header.) >Sometimes I find (for example) directions I had printed not ready as I >am going out the door. > >I can learn to live with the problem, but I am not happy. It would be OK >to get an error notice or warning which says I have to go to my web >browser to print HTML mail. Then at least I'd get what I expect. > > >Also, I do not think it makes CTM look professional to have such an >obvious bug. It certainly prevents me from recommending PowerMail to >others, even if I keep using it. The problem is too quirky for new users >to have to deal with.
well, my 80-year old parents are happily using PM as well as my wife. I have no problem recommending PM to anyone. But I'm wondering why some people need to print some many emails? Isn't it enough to archive the important stuff and have a backup strategy? Thanks and all the best Matthias
