Matthias Schmidt suggested: >Understand Powermail is a textmailer, so if you want to have html use >something else.
Matthias, why do you have to bring up that old nonsense again? Powermail displays HTML messages and it's natural to expect that it should print such messages fine, even if third party software developers wrote that software (Apple in this case I believe). All that yay-saying "use something else" could easily KILL PowerMail some day. To engage in that behaviour is not about being helpful to the community at all. It's just bitching back, that's all there is to it. Please just let it go, OK? To not fully support HTML-messages, at least treating them as full citizens coming in your mailbox, could very well in the long run make PowerMail obsolete and unusable for anyone using email for their business or other important relational purposes. Email is not about being an island, it's about *communicating*. Being incompatible means you put obstacles in the way of your communication. That's not good. This is why moving to zip for attachment was such an important move. While not perfect IMHO for being compatible with some PC users, it's usually working. If CTM hadn''t given us the possibility to display HTML- messages I would have had to abandon it, because I get some important messages that won't display properly without it. Winston, please support CTM by patiently ask for requests and engage in a dialog and try to be little understanding that while CTM are, unlike many other companies developing email software, charging for it, they do provide an alternative that have many features others do not. That gap is closing, yes, and one day CTM will have to make a move, but the call is theirs. That does not mean you shouldn't express your opinion in a constructive manner, but please understand that your point will not be made stronger by just repeating it now and then. Mikael Tech facts: PM 5.5.3 Swedish | OS X 10.4.5 | Powerbook G4/550Mhz | 1GB RAM | 80GB HD
