Jeremy Hughes ([email protected]) wrote:

> I'm not sure what's so wrong with having thousands of message files -
> most application packages (e.g. Safari) contain thousands of resource files.

Just try to copy one 1 MB file versus 1000 files of 1 KB each ... Not to
mention that a monolithic files takes up less space. For the same reason
I am not a big fan of the package idea; even moving rather than copying
a package takes more time. Sometimes when I have to copy a package
containing thousands of files to a slow medium I first compress the
package to a ZIP archive and copy that. Even when the total file size
wouldn't be significantly smaller, copying a single file is so much
faster as to make this worthwhile.

So I'm all for the monolithic database approach. I don't care if a
backup needs to copy the whole file - copying a single file is fast.

- Michael


Michael J. Hußmann

E-mail: [email protected]
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de


Reply via email to