At TVA we do see contamination leaching from the transfer cask after initial 
decontamination.  We do not use the referenced decontamination agents and have 
similar coating on the transfer casks.  As the loaded transfer cask is removed 
from the SFP we perform a continuous water spray and then decontaminate all 
accessible areas to < 1K before placement in the work platform for 
welding/processing.  We do not re-wet the transfer cask but will still see 
contamination leaching particularly from the sides of the transfer cask.  At 
our two PWR sites the SFP activity is low so the subsequent leaching is 
typically in the 5k to 10k range.  At our BWR site the SFP activity is much 
higher and the leaching can be 50k or greater.

Joel Armstrong
Spent Fuel Storage
WBN Phone – 423-365-8903
TVA Cell – 256-497-1405

From: emgoldin []
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:14 PM
To: powernet
Subject: [powernet] Experience with Liquinox (Alconox) decon agent

TVA External Message. Please use caution when opening.
We’re looking for some OE regarding the use of Liquinox (Alconox) brand 
decontamination agent.  We are seeing some odd results when deconning a spent 
fuel transfer cask that has a coating of (Carboline) Carboguard 890 epoxy.  The 
cask is lifted from the pool, deconned successfully to less than 1k smearable 
and then allowed to dry. When rewetted, contamination appears at easily 
detectable levels, requiring significant additional decon.
Does anyone else have experience with such a condition and, if so, what did you 
do to avoid the significant leaching (if that’s what it is)?
Thanks,  Eric Goldin, CHP
RP Support, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
949.368.6727<tel:949.368.6727><> or<>

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

Reply via email to