On 7/20/11 6:18 AM, "Florian Zeitz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe I'm misguided, but I disagree with the "No more big tables" > statement. You either need at least a code point to General_Category > mapping and a way to tell whether a character is compatibility > decomposable as input for the algorithmic classification, or a table > containing the result of of the classification. Both seem relatively > large to me. Perhaps "no more big tables maintained by the IETF" would resonate better? -- Joe Hildebrand _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
