On 7/20/11 9:16 AM, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On 7/20/11 6:18 AM, "Florian Zeitz"<[email protected]> wrote:
Maybe I'm misguided, but I disagree with the "No more big tables"
statement. You either need at least a code point to General_Category
mapping and a way to tell whether a character is compatibility
decomposable as input for the algorithmic classification, or a table
containing the result of of the classification. Both seem relatively
large to me.
Perhaps "no more big tables maintained by the IETF" would resonate better?
Yes, that's more accurate.
/psa
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
