Am 20.07.2011 17:16, schrieb Joe Hildebrand:
> On 7/20/11 6:18 AM, "Florian Zeitz" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Maybe I'm misguided, but I disagree with the "No more big tables"
>> statement. You either need at least a code point to General_Category
>> mapping and a way to tell whether a character is compatibility
>> decomposable as input for the algorithmic classification, or a table
>> containing the result of of the classification. Both seem relatively
>> large to me.
>
> Perhaps "no more big tables maintained by the IETF" would resonate better?
>
Did the IETF itself ever maintain one?
There is still the "PRECIS Derived Property Value Registry" mandated by
section 9.1 to be maintained by the IANA, which (as I understand it) is
basicaly the "table containing the result of the classification" that I
mentioned.
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
