Draft-17 of the precis-framework doc says: "The PRECIS framework, which is defined in terms of the latest version of Unicode as of the time of this writing (6.3), treats the character U+19DA NEW TAI LUE THAM as DISALLOWED. Implementers need to be aware that this treatment is different from IDNA2008 (originally defined in terms of Unicode 5.2), which treats U+19DA as PVALID."
RFC 6452 amends IDNA to say: "1.3. U+19DA NEW TAI LUE THAM DIGIT ONE The GeneralCategory for this character changes from Nd to No. This implies that the derived property value changes from PVALID to DISALLOWED." So the "PVALID" part of the precis draft likely needs to change. Further, I get FREE_PVAL for U+19DA, because it now hits the OtherLetterDigits rule (R), since its general category is No. -- Joe Hildebrand _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
