On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:48:58PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote: > FWIW, it shows _exactly_ why I am concerned about two separate > sets of rules, tables, and experts for PRECIS and IDNA. If we > can't manage to keep things synchronized when PRECIS is under > active development, with a WG that is presumably paying > attention, then getting everything right and keeping it > consistent when we are depending on a few overloaded individuals > seems implausible.
Yeah, it's a good example of the problem. I know in my own case, when Joe poked me I thought, "Uh, isn't that the thing that changed categories? I thought we dealt with that?" Then I looked and realised things had moved around. I certainly fell down in missing this. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
