I amended the subject. I think it helps tremendously if these things
come with names. Also, indicating the (potential) issue in the subject
helps a lot. I suggest to do the same for the other threads.
Regards, Martin.
On 2014/07/31 05:41, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:48:58PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
FWIW, it shows _exactly_ why I am concerned about two separate
sets of rules, tables, and experts for PRECIS and IDNA. If we
can't manage to keep things synchronized when PRECIS is under
active development, with a WG that is presumably paying
attention, then getting everything right and keeping it
consistent when we are depending on a few overloaded individuals
seems implausible.
Yeah, it's a good example of the problem. I know in my own case, when
Joe poked me I thought, "Uh, isn't that the thing that changed
categories? I thought we dealt with that?" Then I looked and
realised things had moved around. I certainly fell down in missing
this.
A
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
