On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 10:20, John C Klensin wrote: > I concur with Andrew's comment and hope that PRECIS doesn't even > need revision or an explicit update. However, you should also > note that those table are not normative and never have been, so > nothing prevents you from running your own calculations against > the derived property rules (which are the normative part).
I am currently building tries based on the derived property rules, but would still appreciate the IANA values being updated. Normative or not, I would like to test my implementation against someone elses. —Sam _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
