> On Mar 19, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Sam Whited <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 10:20, John C Klensin wrote: >> I concur with Andrew's comment and hope that PRECIS doesn't even >> need revision or an explicit update. However, you should also >> note that those table are not normative and never have been, so >> nothing prevents you from running your own calculations against >> the derived property rules (which are the normative part). > > I am currently building tries based on the derived property rules, but would > still appreciate the IANA values being updated. Normative or not, I would > like to test my implementation against someone elses.
The IAB statement contains a rough target for the update to be done by June 2018. I can’t speak for either the designated expert or the IAB, but I’ve been informally assured that this won’t be a problem. So, I’d look for the updated tables by then. Suzanne _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
