On 19 Mar 2018, at 11:42, Sam Whited wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 10:20, John C Klensin wrote:
I concur with Andrew's comment and hope that PRECIS doesn't even
need revision or an explicit update. However, you should also
note that those table are not normative and never have been, so
nothing prevents you from running your own calculations against
the derived property rules (which are the normative part).
Hi John,
That's what I did. I used the IANA table only in unit tests to compare
against my own calculations.
I am currently building tries based on the derived property rules, but
would still appreciate the IANA values being updated. Normative or
not, I would like to test my implementation against someone elses.
Hi Sam,
You can test against my implementation if you like.
https://github.com/tom--/precis
The really tricky part remains open for me: test vectors with strings,
not characters, that exercise _all_ the normative PRECIS logic.
Unfortunately I don't have much time for this work atm.
Tom
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
