> It's a while since this discussion has had an airing. Good to > hear that you're acknowledging that there is still no proof > of an infinite number of Mersenne primes.
Of course he is! There is some *hope* number theorists are now closing in on a proof that there are infinitely many twin primes. But a sequence as sparse as the Mersennes? That is not even a good pipe-dream right now. CC _______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
