Chris Caldwell wrote: >> It's a while since this discussion has had an airing. Good to >> hear that you're acknowledging that there is still no proof >> of an infinite number of Mersenne primes. >> > > Of course he is! There is some *hope* number theorists > are now closing in on a proof that there are infinitely > many twin primes. But a sequence as sparse as the > Mersennes? That is not even a good pipe-dream right > now. > That depends on what you're smoking in that pipe <GGG>
D _______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
