On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Paul Cunningham<paulcun at talk21.com> wrote: > Terminating this community sounds like a very silly thing to do to me. I > would go for option B.
In which case you (collectively) need to come up with at least 3 (and in practice 4 is the workable minimum) people to be the new Core Contributors and lead printing in the future, and tell the OGB who they are. Without those names, we can't move forward with Option B. > Peter Tribble wrote: >> >> The Printing community has less than the required minimum of >> 3 Core Contributors to govern its affairs and, according to the >> OpenSolaris >> constitution, should be terminated. The OpenSolaris Governing Board can >> deal with the situation by: >> ?A) Terminating the community >> ?B) Designating at least 3 new Core Contributors in order to >> revitalize the community, or >> ?C) Merge this community with another (possibly as a project). >> >> If community members step up and make a good case for options >> B or C within the next 30 days (either by guiding the OGB as to who >> the new Core Contributors should be, or by advising the OGB what >> nature of merger would be in the best interests of the affected >> community) then the OGB will work with the community to take that >> option forward. Otherwise, the OGB will ask the website community >> to terminate the community group, following the procedure set forth >> here: >> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/web/infrastructure-setup/ >> >> Thanks, >> >> > > -- > Paul Cunningham > Software Engineer > > > -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
