On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Paul Cunningham<paulcun at talk21.com> wrote: > > > Ghee Teo wrote: >> >> Paul Cunningham wrote: >>> >>> Peter Tribble wrote: >>>> >>>> Paul Cunningham<paulcun at talk21.com> ?wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Terminating this community sounds like a very silly thing to do to me. >>>>> I would go for option B. >>>> >>>> In which case you (collectively) need to come up with at least 3 (and in >>>> practice 4 is the workable minimum) people to be the new Core >>>> Contributors and lead printing in the future, and tell the OGB who >>>> they are. Without those names, we can't move forward with Option B. >>> >>> I suppose it will die then. As normal, "Printing out of sight out of >>> mind", until it doesn't work. >> >> I believe 3 ?things must happen to keep the community going: >> >> 1. The existing Core contributors speaks out their intention here and >> satisfied the OGB basic requirements which is reasonable for a community. >> >> 2. Some active participants in the community step up and take on more >> active role and be a core contributor. >> >> 3. Each core contributor must be committed to make some form of >> contributions either in discussion or direction actively. >> >> The thought of of "Printing out of sight out of mind" should be not be >> allowed :) >> >> So Paul, will you consider 2 and 3 ? >> >> I am putting my name forwards as a core contributor, should the existing >> 'active' contributors want to take me on. > > You get a 'yes' from me
Would you (Paul) want to be one of the Core Contributors in a revitalized printing community? -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
