What about those of us who do printing sustaining in house? 
We have a team internally (most of which are on the printing-discuss alias), 
im sure we could grub together a few of us to help the open-printing cause?

What do we need to do to become core contributors? If there are some
guidelines somewhere I can pass these on to the rest of the team and see
if we can drum up some support?

Cheers
Jonathan

* Paul Cunningham (paulcun at talk21.com) wrote:
>
>
> Ghee Teo wrote:
>> Paul Cunningham wrote:
>>> Peter Tribble wrote:
>>>> Paul Cunningham<paulcun at talk21.com>  wrote:
>>>>> Terminating this community sounds like a very silly thing to do to me. 
>>>>> I would go for option B.
>>>>
>>>> In which case you (collectively) need to come up with at least 3 (and in
>>>> practice 4 is the workable minimum) people to be the new Core
>>>> Contributors and lead printing in the future, and tell the OGB who
>>>> they are. Without those names, we can't move forward with Option B.
>>>
>>> I suppose it will die then. As normal, "Printing out of sight out of 
>>> mind", until it doesn't work.
>> I believe 3  things must happen to keep the community going:
>> 1. The existing Core contributors speaks out their intention here and 
>> satisfied the OGB basic requirements which is reasonable for a community.
>> 2. Some active participants in the community step up and take on more 
>> active role and be a core contributor.
>> 3. Each core contributor must be committed to make some form of 
>> contributions either in discussion or direction actively.
>> The thought of of "Printing out of sight out of mind" should be not be 
>> allowed :)
>> So Paul, will you consider 2 and 3 ?
>> I am putting my name forwards as a core contributor, should the existing 
>> 'active' contributors want to take me on.
>
> You get a 'yes' from me
>
> Paul
>
>> So let the discussion continue!
>
>
>
>>>>
>>>>> Peter Tribble wrote:
>>>>>> The Printing community has less than the required minimum of
>>>>>> 3 Core Contributors to govern its affairs and, according to the
>>>>>> OpenSolaris
>>>>>> constitution, should be terminated. The OpenSolaris Governing Board 
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> deal with the situation by:
>>>>>>  A) Terminating the community
>>>>>>  B) Designating at least 3 new Core Contributors in order to
>>>>>> revitalize the community, or
>>>>>>  C) Merge this community with another (possibly as a project).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If community members step up and make a good case for options
>>>>>> B or C within the next 30 days (either by guiding the OGB as to who
>>>>>> the new Core Contributors should be, or by advising the OGB what
>>>>>> nature of merger would be in the best interests of the affected
>>>>>> community) then the OGB will work with the community to take that
>>>>>> option forward. Otherwise, the OGB will ask the website community
>>>>>> to terminate the community group, following the procedure set forth
>>>>>> here:
>>>>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/web/infrastructure-setup/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>
>
> -- 
> Paul Cunningham
> Software Engineer
> Tel:
> _______________________________________________
> printing-discuss mailing list
> printing-discuss at opensolaris.org

-- 
Jonathan Cowper-Andrewes - Solaris RPE - Approachability.

E-mail : jonathan.ca at sun.com
       : jonathan.ca at sun.itechtool.com

Ext    : x22907 / (0) 1252 422907 (Direct Dial)
Mobile : +44 (0) 7920 477803

Sun Microsystems (UK) Limited
Guillemont Park-Bldg. 3
Minley Road
Blackwater,camberley
GU17 9QG

 "If you are going through Hell, Keep Going"
                                Winston Churchill

Reply via email to