Shangara Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Dear ShangaraRichard - How many service packs have you applied to NT and Win2000 ;-) Same difference really. However, I don't think there's enough changes to warrant charging for, er, Jaguar (yes, Paul...). If I could've had the extra stability and speed, which should've been delivered with OS X, I wouldn't have upgraded. I don't use 99% of the added features and I suspect a lot of other people don't either.
NT 4 in it's whole life span and of course it's still going totals I think 5 in about as many years and Win2K is up to 3 is it in three years? However from my recollection there was never a pressing need to run the service packs.
Now I admit to not having had my eye on the ball as regards to OSX but the version numbers do seem to be adding up at an alarming rate which to me says one of two things.
a) A heck of a lot of new features they thought it needed after launch.
b) A heck of a lot needed putting right after launch.
c) Apple are a factitious lot and this is simply very fine tuning and really the product was OK from the start.
The idea of running ones business on an operating system that's still in beta seems rather risky and at best rather time consuming from the posts about it here.
Cheers
Richard
--
For quality scans that are really right...No Messing. Satisfaction Guaranteed.
New PDF on request. +44 (0)1873 890670 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rkdi.co.uk
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
