About five years ago, while working with much less capable equipment than now, I knew the end of my wet darkroom was near. On numerous occasions I ran a test where I produced the best 8x10 traditional color print from a neg that I could. I'd then take the same neg, scan and output to an Epson EX. When comparing visual quality of the prints, not once did someone select the darkroom produced print as superior. The finesse over local tone control and sharpness that a digital workflow provides can't be matched in a darkroom. I'm not surprised that you prefer the look of your Epson prints over the Cibas.
Bob Smith
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 06:20 AM, Geoff Dor� wrote:
after a little tweaking (and bearing in mind still quite new to this, see my other posts!) am impressed with the A3 prints done on the Epson 1290 and which are coming out better than Cibas (same image, same size) especially in terms of sharpness (or 'apparent sharpness' for the pedantic) and retention of highlight/control of contras
=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
