|
I had never shot
anything at 1600 before so I was curious to try it out. The photo was shot
under flourescent lighting using the Fuji FL3 color balance setting. I
put the photo on the web at:
I was surprised that
the graininess was that nasty looking at 100 percent. But I have nothing
to compare it to so I don't know if it's good in comparison to other cameras or
not. I shoot at 400 occasionally with this camera and those files look
just great in my opinion.
Rick Lee
------------------------------------------- www.rickleephoto.com Instant Message: RickLeeFS ------------------------------------------- -----Original Message-----
Richard Wills Subject: [PRODIG] Fuji
S2 1600 files
Dear List,
Does any one have experience of using the S2 @
1600? How are the results?
The reason I ask is that Leeds finally have a body
for me, but no demo stock, so I can't try before I buy...
Fuji states that the noise at 1600 is dramatically
reduced, compared to other cameras, so can any body tell me, what's it like
please? I would be prepared to accept a quality equal to traditional 35mm (800
neg @ plus 1 or neopan 1600).
Can any one point me in the right direction, before
the amex card takes a minor hit...
Richard Wills
|
- [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files Richard Wills
- Re: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files Shangara Singh
- Re: [PRODIG] Nikon announce DX Lenses Simon Leibowitz
- RE: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files Rick Lee
- Re: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files Richard Wills
- RE: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files Rick Lee
- RE: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files Paul Bradforth
- RE: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files Rick Lee
- Re: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files/fade Michael Wilkinson
- Re: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files Shangara Singh
- Re: [PRODIG] Fuji S2 1600 files rob wilkinson
